Just check the feature request forum for what is felt missing. Anyway 2, a v6 would be a logical release for breaking changes/improvements. Anyway, looking at this forum the vast majority seems to use it exclusively on Windows and many gadget details need sadly low level hacks(aka api calls). So when a source code is loaded by double-clicking on the related file, the currently assigned PureBasic.

When one 'PureBasic.exe' is started, it will assign all '.pb' files with this version of PureBasic. That's a major technical implementation change, but not any improvement to the language itself (syntax, constructs, grammar, refinements, productivity). Create different folders like 'PureBasicv3.94' and 'PureBasicv4' and install the related PureBasic version in each folders. (I admit the Amiga support is very bad, but you can still download the old Amiga version and use it). It now compiles to both ASM and C output, and is the only Basic on the market that doesn't requiring any supporting frameworks (like Java) to compile for 5 different platforms (6 if you include the web with SpiderBasic): Windows, Mac, Linux, Raspberry PI, and Amiga. Say what? PureBasic has just undergone a MAJOR upgrade in a huge way. Lebostein wrote: ↑ Mon 6:05 pmWhy is this version 6? I see only a very small list of new features, most of them are updates of third party libraries

PureBasic 6.03 instal